Paris is beginning to acknowledge the possibility
that India might not buy the Rafale fighter because of sharp
differences over the price, and New Delhi’s insistence on enforceable
guarantees regarding the fighter’s delivery, performance and
availability.
A senior French official with a close view of the on-going negotiations
between New Delhi and Paris for 36 Rafale fighters told Business
Standard on condition of anonymity: “If some people in the MoD do not
want to allow the Rafale deal to go through, so be it. We are currently building it for Egypt and Qatar, and we could have another customer in Malaysia.”
Underlining the irritation at repeated US offers to set up an assembly line in India to build the American F-16 Super
Viper, the French official taunted: “If you don’t want the Rafale, go
ahead and build the F-16 here. You can build it in India and supply it
to Pakistan also.”
He was referring to Washington’s announcement last month of the sale to
Pakistan of eight advanced Block 50/52 F-16 fighters for $699 million.
Simultaneously, a senior Lockheed Martin official had publicly offered
to “move our [F-16] production line from the US to India.”
Reminded that France too was supplying submarines to both India and
Pakistan (DCNS is building six Scorpenes submarines with Mazagon Dock,
after earlier selling Pakistan three advanced Agosta-90B submarines with
air independent propulsion), he retorted, “That is different. Pakistan
is getting a different submarine from what we are providing to India.”
The official dismissed the notion that an Indian order was critical for
Dassault to break even in the Rafale project, in which tens of billion
Euros have been spent on developing the fighter and establishing a
production line. The official claimed, “The Rafale project is
commercially viable based on the numbers that the French military
requires, even if there is not a single export order.”
In fact, defence budget cuts have forced the French military to slash
Rafale orders from over 300 originally planned to just 180 ordered so
far. That is a small order, given that the Eurofighter Typhoon has over
700 aircraft on order; while more than 4,500 F-16s have been built over
the years.
On New Delhi’s demands for sovereign guarantees from the French
government, or a bank guarantee from Dassault, to cover the possibility
of delivery or performance shortfalls in the Rafale, the official
declared that the two countries would soon sign an inter-governmental
agreement (IGA), which would function as a sovereign guarantee.
“The government of France is standing behind the sale. Surely India is
not asking for a bank guarantee when it has the word of the French
government?” asked the official.
When it was pointed out that the IGA would only outline a supply
agreement in broad terms, without detailed binding clauses and
penalties, the official responded that the IGA was a strategic agreement
between Paris and New Delhi, and that “a phrase here or a sentence
there would make no difference.”
“In 1917, when the United States abandoned its isolationism and sent a
division of troops to France to fight in World War I, it was not
because there was some document with a clause that required them to
fight. It was because of a common strategic aim. New Delhi and Paris
must have a common strategic aim on the Rafale.”
French officials argue that, if Dassault is required to provide a bank
guarantee against possible shortfalls in delivery and performance,
India should cover that cost, which is normally 3-4 per cent of the
guarantee amount.
Meanwhile, the Cost Negotiation Committee on the Rafale has made
little headway in bridging the gap between the French demand and Indian
counter-offer, which are believed to be around Euro 12 billion and Euro 9
billion respectively. Issues of liability are further complicating the
likelihood of a deal soon.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while visiting Paris last April, had
requested for 36 Rafales, after a breakdown in negotiations for a much
larger order for 126 Rafales. The Indian Air Force had chosen the Rafale
on January 31, 2012, after an exhaustive evaluation of six fighter
aircraft.
businessstandard
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.