Lockheed
Martin, the US firm that is offering to relocate F-16 fighter production to
India as the world’s only F-16 line, has rebutted the argument that perceptions
of the F-16 as an “outdated fighter” would mean very little international business
flowing to India.
The company
points out that, over the last three months, the US State Department has informed
the US Congress of the proposed sale to Bahrain of 19 fighters in the F-16V
configuration for an estimated $2.8 billion; and the upgrade of 123 Greek F-16s
for an estimated $2.4 billion.
Asked about
further F-16 orders, a Lockheed Martin spokesperson revealed that, beyond the
100-200 fighters India would buy, “F-16 production opportunities include
multiple countries in the Middle East, the Mediterranean, Central Europe,
Southeast Asia, and South America — approximately 200 aircraft altogether.”
Further, “Lockheed
Martin also has three F-16V upgrade programs on contract today — a total of
around 325 aircraft — and is in discussions with several other customers
interested in upgrading their F-16 fleets with the latest technology.”
Assuming a
price of $80 million for each current version F-16 Block 70 fighter, the
production of 200 new fighters would bring to India business worth $16 billion.
And,
extrapolating from the Greek order an upgrade cost of $20 million per F-16, Lockheed
Martin already has $6.5 billion worth of upgrade orders. With 4,588 F-16s
delivered over the decades to some 25 air forces, and an estimated 3,000 of
them still in service, the Indian F-16 line could expect to upgrade some 1,000
F-16s over the years, bringing in $20 billion of business.
Lockheed
Martin is competing to build the F-16 Block 70 in India, with its rival being
the Gripen E fighter offered by Swedish company, Saab.
In the
absence of an Indian production line – which would only be established if the
Indian Air Force (IAF) selects the F-16 – these orders will flow to an
alternate F-16 production line Lockheed Martin has set up in Greenville, South
Carolina.
Randy
Howard, who heads Lockheed Martin’s international business development, told
Business Standard, the Greenville production line had to be established as a “temporary
measure”. This was to meet continuing F-16 orders, since the India line was
uncertain and the old F-16 production line at Fort Worth, Texas was being given
over to building the F-35 joint strike fighter.
Were India to choose to buy the F-16, the Greenville
line would be shut down, says Howard. “What’s on offer for India is to
establish a production line here that would be the world’s only production
line.”
The India line would be gradually ramped up
to build 3-4 fighters per month, says Howard, a production rate India has never
come close to achieving while building other fighters like the Jaguar,
Sukhoi-30MKI or Tejas.
“This would position Indian industry at the center of the world’s most
extensive and successful fighter aircraft supply ecosystem. We expect Indian
industry… to be highly competitive within that global supply ecosystem, which
in turn opens the door for new relationships and opportunities… around the
globe”, says a Lockheed Martin spokesperson.
A confident Howard points to Lockheed
Martin’s success building up the Turkish aerospace industry: “[The Turkish F-16
production line] was a wheat field. There was nothing there. Today it is the
largest aerospace facility in Turkey, and there is a complete eco-system around
it. We know how to do this.”
If Lockheed Martin has a compelling
business case for India to choose the F-16 and transfer the production line to
India, Sweden’s counter is the offer of unmatched technology transfer to India.
A senior Swedish government official told Business Standard on Wednesday: “We
all know the F-16 would have technology ‘black boxes’ that the US would not
part with. The Gripen E comes with far greater levels of technology transfer.”
Defence analysts point out that the US defence industry is in a win-win situation. India’s choice of the F-16 would be a windfall for US firms. But if New Delhi opts for the Gripen E instead, US industry would still benefit, since 40 per cent of the Gripen E is American.
ajaishukla
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.