Home

July 6, 2018

Korea to offer KT-1 Trainers to India


India and South Korea are expected to hold talks on purchase of jet trainers for the Indian Air Force during the visit of South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Monday.

“The visit of the South Korean leader is important for India from the perspective of defence and security,” sources told FE. Trainee aircraft ‘KT-1’ of Korean Aircraft Industries of South Korea could be considered for the Indian Air Force (IAF), as it was one of the shortlisted aircraft in 2011. The issue is likely to come up for discussion during delegation-level talks.

Growing opportunities in naval shipbuilding and port infrastructure in India will also be the part of the agenda.

The IAF, which is facing acute shortage of trainee aircraft, is exploring other options besides 75 PC-7 Turbo Trainers, manufactured by Pilatus Aircraft of Switzerland. These planes were purchased at `30 crore per aircraft.

According to the contract, there was a provision under which the IAF might buy another 38 PC-7 Turbo Trainers and the Swiss company is pushing for it. However, the IAF is wary of Pilatus as the company is under investigation for alleged corrupt practices.

At present, the IAF’s training fleet includes homegrown Kiran Mark I and II basic trainers and British company BAE Systems’ advanced Hawk trainers. An order has been placed with Hindustan Aeronautics for a minimum of HTT-40 trainers.

The Pilatus aircraft was picked through a two-year competitive process involving Korean Aircraft Industries (KAI) of South Korea, GROB Aircraft of Germany, EADS PZL of Poland, Hawker Beechcraft’s T-6C of the US, Alenia Aerammachi of Italy, Aerostar of Romania and Pilatus of Switzerland.The choice was eventually narrowed down to Korean Aircraft Industries KT-1, Hawker Beechcraft and Pilatus.

Trainer aircraft are planes used to teach cadets to fly when they join the air force. The IAF decided to purchase Pilatus PC-7 Mk-II after indigenous HTP-32 had been grounded due to repeated failures.
When the Manmohan Singh-led government had signed a `2,896-crore deal for 75 BTA with Pilatus Aircraft in May 2012, the competitors had red flagged the purchase. In 2016, the Ministry of Defence had started looking at the acquisition.

FE

Taiwan protests Air India move to change name to Chinese Taipei


Taiwan on Thursday protested Air India’s decision to change its name to Chinese Taipei on the website of the national carrier, even as India defended the move saying it is consistent with international norms and its position on the island.

However, Beijing welcomed the decision by Air India, asserting that foreign companies operating in the country must obey China’s law and respect its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said, “Air India’s decision to rename the destination of Taiwan as Chinese Taipei is entirely consistent with international norms and our own position on Taiwan since 1949.”

In a statement, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center here (TECC) said it is deeply disappointed with Air India’s decision and “regrets” that the move can be seen as a gesture of succumbing to the “unreasonable and absurd pressure” from China. It said the matter has been taken up with the MEA.

TECC further said its Representative Ambassador Chung Kwang Tien calls upon Air India to stand up against the “unreasonable demand” from China and promptly restore the name of “Taiwan” on its website. It said he hoped the Indian government would provide firm support to its public services and private businesses to defend themselves from a foreign country’s “bully actions”.

The TECC said it had lodged a formal note against the name change with the MEA and is waiting for its official response.

Earlier, an Air India spokesperson said it followed the procedure as advised by the MEA in updating its website with respect to changing the name of Taiwan.

Responding to Air India’s decision, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang said Beijing welcomes the move.

indianexpress

July 5, 2018

China to Develop New Carrier-based Fighters to Replace J-15 Aircraft


China is building a new carrier based fighter jet to replace its J-15 fighters after a series of crashes and mechanical failures, according to military experts and sources.

“In order to improve the combat effectiveness of the Chinese aircraft carrier strike groups, it is necessary to develop a new carrier-based fighter,” Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie was quoted as saying by South China Morning Post Wednesday.

China plans to create at least four aircraft carrier groups to fulfil its navy ambitions and to defend its overseas interest, Li said.

The need to develop a new fighter jet has become more pressing after a series of “unpardonable mechanical failures” that have killed one top PLA pilot and injured another.

Two sources close to the military told the Post there had been at least four crashes involving the J-15, although only two of them have been reported by state media.

“The J-15 is a problematic aircraft – its unstable flight control system was the key factor behind the two fatal accidents two years ago,” one of the sources said.

Pilot Zhang Chao, 29, died in a crash in April 2016 as he tried to save his J-15 fighter jet, whose flight control system was breaking down during a mock landing on an aircraft carrier, according to state media reports.

Three weeks later, his colleague Cao Xianjian, believed to be in his 40s, was seriously injured as he tried to deal with the same problem on a J-15. It took him more than a year to recover.

All J-15s were grounded for three months after the crashes, which undermined morale in the air force and navy. The navy called for an investigation after Zhang’s death, the sources said.

“But the aviation experts at first refused to acknowledge that the J-15 has design problems,” one of the sources said. “They only agreed there were problems after Cao encountered the same trouble.”

Many of China’s home-grown fighter jets have had problems with their engines, aircraft design and modifications. But a PLA Navy veteran said that instead of carrying out more test flights, pilots were pushed to fly the warplanes, even though they had faults.

“Of course it’s impossible to prevent any accident from ever happening during training. But unlike their counterparts in Western countries, Chinese air force pilots are asked to work around these mechanical errors,” the navy veteran said.

The J-15 was based on a prototype of the fourth-generation Russian Sukhoi Su-33 twin-engined air superiority fighter, a design that is more than 30 years old. It was developed by Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, a unit of state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China.

With a maximum take-off weight of 33 tonnes, the aircraft is the heaviest active carrier-based fighter jet in the world, used on China’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.

China’s FC-31 is a newer generation stealth fighter that made its first flight in 2012, and is smaller and lighter than the J-15.

 defenseworld

Indian Army to soon get armed drones from Israel


Indian Army would soon have armed drones in its inventory. During the annual joint working group discussion between India and Israel held in South Block on Tuesday, both sides moved forward to finalise the deal to provide 10 Heron TP armed drones for Indian Army. The deal worth $400 million had been pending for over three years.

The drones, to be acquired under 'Project Cheetah', will help the force hit target (enemy) with air-to-ground missiles after tracking it down.

Till date, Indian security forces use UAVs or drones only for surveillance and reconnaissance missions.

Only a few countries have armed drones, which include the US, the UK, China, Israel, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, and South Africa.

"Armed drones will certainly be a force multiplier. The Army has been trying to acquire it for long," said a senior defence ministry official who added that the 'Project Cheetah' was first initiated during the UPA tenure, but was put in the cold storage. In 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government decided to revive the project to give a fresh push to defence cooperation between India and Israel. Simultaneously, India is trying to crack a deal with the US to acquire its armed Predator drones.

On Tuesday, a delegation led by Israel defence secretary Major General (Retd) held the annual joint working group discussion on bilateral defence cooperation with his Indian counterpart Sanjay Mitra in South Block.

Besides Heron TP, other pending procurements from Israel were also discussed during the talk. The purchase of two more PHALCON radar systems for Airborne Warning and Control System, to be mounted on Russian IL-76, was also taken up along with the ongoing programme of upgrading of Heron unmanned aerial vehicles. Indian security agencies are using unarmed Heron drones for surveillance.

Defence sources said that Israel also raised the long pending deal of Spike anti tank guided missile systems for Indian Army, which is facing shortage of such fire-and-forget missile system. Military sources maintained that India will also be losing its edge over Pakistan Army, which has equipped its infantry soldiers with such missiles that can strike Indian tanks and bunkers from a distance of 3-4 km. India's equivalent missiles have a range of just 2 km.

 theweek

July 4, 2018

6 US “Allies” That Are Russia’s Newest Partners


Russia has mastered the art of making new partnerships among nations that in the 20th and much of the 21st century were and in some cases still are traditional American allies. As the long dead realities of the Cold War era become dramatically re-shaped by the age of multipolarity and increased interconnectivity between global regions, it is helpful to look at some of the countries with whom Russia is a close partner or healthy friend in spite of their past or even presently close relations with Washington.


1. Turkey

For centuries, Russo-Turkish wars dominated the landscape of multiple global regions including Black Sea coasts and hinterlands as well as the Balkan region. But in the 1920s, the arrival of Ataturk and his Grand National Assembly of Turkey looked to establish healthy ties with the equally fledgling Soviet state.

Turkey was still in the midst of its own civil crisis when USSR founder Lenin and Republic of Turkey founder Ataturk signed an historic Friendship Treaty in Moscow which put to rest centuries of Russo-Turkish antagonism. Indeed, so friendly was Ataturk’s relationship with the USSR that when former World War era triumvir Enver Pasha attempted to lead a Turkic revolt against the USSR in central Asia, the so-called Basmachi movement, Ataturk continued to renounce Enver Pasha and maintained good ties with Moscow.

Yet however strong the friendship between Lenin’s USSR and Ataturk’s Turkey was in the 1920s, by the end of the 1930s relations showed signs of frost and by 1952, Turkey had joined NATO and become a close ally of the United States.

Against this background, it seems almost surreal that the shooting down of a Russian Sukhoi Su-24 in 2015 by “Turkish forces” would perversely be the gateway to a historic rapprochement. Indeed at the time, the downing of the Russian jet became the catalyst for a severe downgrading of relations. But by 2016, facts had begun to emerge that the order to shot at the plane came not from legitimate Turkish forces. Furthermore, it was found that those responsible for the downing were not legitimate Turkish soldiers. Instead, the Fethullah Terror Organisation (FETO) had ordered the attack in an attempt to destroy any possibility for future Russo-Turkish cooperation.

When in 2016, FETO agents in the armed forces set their sights not on Russia but on the legitimate government of Turkey, it was Russian intelligence that warned President Erdogan of the attempted coup which allowed him to re-group patriotic Turks who eventually saw off the FETO provocation.

Since then, Russia and Turkey have not only re-established healthy ties but have embarked on a uniquely meaningful partnership given the long history of hostility between the two nations which dates back to before the founding of the USA. This has been the case in spite of the brutal assassination of Russia’s Ambassador to Turkey Andrey Karlov by a FETO agent in late 2016.

Today, Russia is a major supplier of energy to Turkey while both countries work on the Turk Stream pipeline which will bring Russian gas into southern Europe. Likewise, Russia has begun construction on Turkey’s first ever nuclear power plant which will be on line in approximately two years.

In Syria, Turkey and Russia along with Iran work in the Astana format to bring a negotiated settlement to the conflict while both countries have resolved many of their initial differences over each side’s penultimate aim in the conflict. With Turkey insistent that it will complete its purchase of the Russian made S-400 missile defence system in spite of the threat of US sanctions as a consequence, officials in Ankara have suggested that if this means the US will renege on the deal to physically deliver F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, Russia’s Su-57 fifth generation fighters could be an attractive alternative.

As the US continues to needlessly antagonise Turkey on multiple fronts, Russia’s already healthy partnership with Turkey is set only to expand as Erdogan and Putin have developed a relationship based on trust, transparency and pragmatism which is more than can be said of Ankara’s current state of relations with Washington.


2. Israel

While Israel is often correctly described as America’s closest ally, the fact of the matter is that Russian relations with Tel Aviv are incredibly strong and growing stronger. In an age where Tel Aviv and its lobbyists abroad accuse multiple European societies of being antisemitic whilst even some political factions in the US are accused of the same, Russia is uniquely immune to this accusation. The fact of the matter is that while social cohesion in the US and Europe appears to be undermined due to a combination of radical liberalism, mass migration and economic decline, Russia’s historically multi-ethnic and multi-religious state continues to function without major incident. Russian and Israeli information conduits have not allowed this to go unnoticed.

But beyond this soft power victory for Russia in the eyes of Tel Aviv’s leaders, Russia has actively courted Israel on the basis of the fact that many Russian Jews now live there and also on the basis of Russia’s strategy of anti-ideological/anti-sectarian balancing of Middle Eastern interests.

While Russia remains partners with Syria, Palestine and Iran, Russia is equally a partner of Israel. Today, Moscow and Tel Aviv are on the same page regarding a withdrawal of Iranian and Hezbollah troops from Syria. While both sides reached this point of agreement in different ways and for different reasons, President Putin’s government has shown a willingness to work with any partner in the region on a case-by-case basis and Israel is no exception, not least because Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu share a good personal relationship.

Furthermore, it must be noted that at a time when Russia and Israel continue to cooperate ever more economically and in terms of regional security dialogue – in spite of the fact that Israel is often more western in its mentality than most geographically western regimes, Tel Aviv has never joined the US, EU, Canada and Australia in anti-Russian sanctions nor in accusing Russia of playing a negative role in the world. Instead, Tel Aviv has officially adopted the 9th of May as a celebration of the Soviet and allied victory over fascism in 1945 at a time when western leaders shamefully boycott events commemorating the victory against Hitler’s fascist empire.

Before one thinks that this partnership has come at the expense of Russia’s older Syrian ally, one must forgo such zero-sum dogmas and look objectively at what the Russo-Israeli partnership has accomplished for Syria. Russian diplomats have persuaded Tel Aviv to agree to tacitly accept the legitimacy of the Arab Nationalist Syrian President Bashar al-Assad so long as Russia helps to facilitate an orderly Iranian and Hezbollah withdrawal from the Arab Republic. While this agreement is a compromise on both sides (as one could expect), one must realise that after decades of trying to undermine Ba’athist Syria, because of Russia and only because of Russia, Israel is now in a position to agree to cease attacking its Syrian foe for the fist time in decades. Such an agreement could scarcely have been struck by any other mediator. In the fraught context of the Middle East, this is as close to a win-win as one could hope for and moreover, it is one that could preserve Syria’s government which after all was the primary objective of Damascus in defending against a multilateral hybrid war against its sovereignty that has raged since 2011.


3. Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia remains America’s closest ally in the Arab world but under the de-facto leadership of Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman, Riyadh is rapidly engaging in attempts to expand the petro-Kingdom’s geo-economic portfolio. This has resulted in excellent relations with both China and Russia.

Rather than working against Saudi Arabia in a race to the bottom in respect of energy prices, in 2016 Moscow decided to begin working with Saudi Arabia to stabilise oil prices in a highly competitive global market. The result has been the formation of the OPEC+ format where Russia and Saudi Arabia are now the de-facto trendsetters in the global price of oil. As Russia’s economy is more diverse than that of Saudi Arabia, Russia is in effect the king-maker in the OPEC+ format that Riyadh is keen to formalise in a would-be “Super-OPEC” cartel.

Additionally, Saudi Arabia has courted Russian expertise in the services of developing the new mega-city NEOM, while Riyadh is simultaneously working with Russia on deals that would see Russian companies build Saudi Arabia’s first nuclear power station. Additionally, Riyadh continues to express interest in the purchase of Russia’s S-400 missile systems.

In the 1970s, OPEC’s ability to manipulate the price of oil could bring down major economies and likewise, OPEC’s cooperation could ease economic tensions. Today, a similar power is jointly in the hands of Saudi Arabia and its Russian superpower partner. In spite of Washington’s close ties with multiple Saudi officials – the era of Muhammad bin Salman is also the dawning of a golden era in Russo-Saudi relations.


4. Pakistan

Pakistan’s close relationship with the United States has never been an easy one. In 1977, the US backed General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq led a coup against the democratically elected Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, thus ushering in a 1980s decade that Pakistanis remain divided about in terms of Zia’s legacy to the country. In 1999, a similar anti-democratic coup took place when General Pervez Musharraf took power.

The recent Musharraf era remains a major talking point in this year’s Pakistani General Election as the surging PTI opposition party in particular has highlighted the grave suffering that Pakistanis have endured due to Musharraf’s unwavering support for George W. Bush’s so-called “war on terror”.

While Pakistan exposed itself to multiple terrorist attacks during the course of America’s ongoing struggle to subdue Afghanistan, today under Donald Trump, rather than thanking Pakistan for doing everything Washington said during the “war on terror”, Trump has instead cut over $200 billion worth of funds to Pakistan and has worked to “greylist” Islamabad through the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

Throughout this process, Pakistan has intensified its always strong relationship with China. The Sino-Pakistan partnership looks to elevate the material condition of the Pakistani people while helping to provide sustainable models for internal development that the US never bothered to offer even during the Bush-Musharraf years.

But while Pakistan’s very visible partnership with China continues to dominate headlines, Pakistan is simultaneously engaged in a new positive relationship with Russia. Below is a lengthy discussion from geopolitical expert Andrew Korybko charting the evolution of Russo-Pakistan relations in the modern era.

As a strategically located south Asia power that now increasingly shares similar goals to Moscow in respect of Afghanistan, it was inevitable that an impetus for more intensified positive relations would develop. With Moscow’s seemingly ‘long gone’ Soviet era partner India rapidly becoming America’s key partner in a wider anti-China campaign in the region, Russia now has all the more incentive to expand its relations with Pakistan.


5. South Korea

Unlike Turkey and Pakistan but very much like Saudi Arabia and Israel, South Korea retains very healthy relations with the United States. However, the economic realities of the 21st century have seen the Trump administration accuse South Korea of “dumping” goods on US shores while Washington’s tariff barrage has not been any friendlier to South Korea than it has to traditional Asian rivals of the United States. With Seoul making a formal complaint to the World Trade Organisation regarding Trump’s protectionist onslaught, the north east Asian industrial powerhouse is looking for and rapidly attaining new export markets including both China and Russia.

South Korea was the first country to embrace Russian President Putin’s proposals for tripartite economic cooperation between the two Korean states and Russia. This proposal was made in the autumn of 2017 during the nadir of the US-DPRK nuclear war of words. Nevertheless, South Korean President Moon Jae-in remained fully supportive of Putin’s proposals.

Less than a year later and Russia is already in talks with South Korea to help construct modern road, rail and gas pipeline links between Russian territory and South Korea via the DPRK. Russia’s role in the Korean peace process has been vital and President Moon’s recent endorsement of the future Russia-Korean Economic Corridor during his recent trip to Moscow confirms that so far as Seoul is concerned, a new era of peace through prosperity on the Korean peninsula requires vital Russian participation which President Putin has been happy to offer. For Moscow and Seoul peace and prosperity are indelibly linked, while Russia’s historically good relations with Pyongyang are seen as beneficial to a new reality wherein Moscow’s relations with Seoul are likewise exceptionally strong.


6. The Philippines

The election of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte in 2016 was a watershed in Manila’s relations with the wider world. Upon winning the election, Duterte forsook what he called “the colonial mentality” and warmly embraced new partnerships with China and Russia. Duterte has praised Russia’s forthright dealings with The Philippines over security issues. Indeed, Duterte was meeting with President Putin in 2017 when the Daesh aligned Maute group laid siege to the Mindanao city of Marawi.

Understanding Duterte’s sense of urgency, Russia offered The Philippines free arms shipments to help the country to better fight terrorism and maintain social order. Duterte’s 2017 trip to Moscow was crucial for helping to establish a new era of Russo-Philippine relations that can and should lead to a free trade agreement between ASEAN member The Philippines and the de-facto Russian led Eurasian Economic Union.

While the two countries do not have a long history of relations, Russia has proved it is a reliable multipolar partner for Duterte’s manifold war on Takfiri terrorism, political extremist terrorism and narco-terrorism.


Conclusion ::

Russia’s ability to build new partnerships is objectively an impressive diplomatic feat. Crucially though, it must be remembered that during this same period, Russia has remained close to traditional Cold War allies while mending fences with partnerships that were lost in the midst of or just after the Cold War. Russia is a country that is a partner with both Vietnam and China, Egypt and Turkey, Syria, Israel and Palestine, Iran and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and to a more limited degree than in the Cold War, with India, The Philippines and Cambodia, Mozambique and South Africa and many others.

 eurasiafuture

French arms exports halved in 2017 as Rafale sales dried up


French weaponry exports fell sharply last year in the absence of major deals to sell new Rafale fighter jets, with Middle Eastern clients again making up the bulk of the orders, the French defence ministry said on Monday.

In its annual report to parliament, the ministry said the value of exports dropped to 6.9 billion euros ($8 billion) from 14 billion euros the previous year and the record 17 billion euros booked in 2015.

Those two years saw the first big export orders for Rafale jets made by Dassault Aviation—to Egypt, Qatar and India—following a string of failed efforts to sell the planes outside France.

But France, the world's third-biggest arms exporter after the US and Russia, will book an additional 12 Rafale sales to Qatar this year.

"The results from 2017, with 6.9 billion euros, are in line with the average from years before the Rafale contracts," the ministry said.

It added that helicopters and missiles made up nearly half of last year's foreign orders.

Orders from Middle East clients rose to 3.9 billion euros from 1.9 billion euros in 2016, despite an economic slowdown stemming from lower oil prices, "which delayed some acquisition projects", the ministry said.

NGOs and other critics have assailed France for supplying weapons to middle eastern governments, in particular Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates over their support for pro-government forces in Yemen fighting Houthi rebels.


Big bets remain on India ::

The Rafale continues to remain among the most high-profile weapon systems offered by France for export in addition to helicopters, surface warships and submarines. It is expected to be the sole fighter aircraft in French service in the coming years as older 'Mirage' variants retire; however, despite its advanced technology, the Rafale has had a mixed record in winning export sales compared with previous generations of French fighters.

A much-touted deal by India to buy 126 Rafales was axed by the Narendra Modi government in 2015 after years of negotiation, with India settling for a smaller, outright purchase of 36 Rafales. Dassault has again offered the Rafale to the Indian Air Force for a new contract to buy 110 fighters and is also bidding for a separate Indian Navy contract for 57 fighters.

 theweek

July 3, 2018

GRSE unveils design proposal for Brazilian corvette programme


Indian naval shipyard Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers (GRSE) has unveiled its design concept for the Brazilian Navy’s Tamandaré-class corvette programme.

The Kolkata-based shipyard has teamed with Israel’s Elbit Systems Ltd for the supply of combat systems and local firm Sinergy Group Corporate (which owns EISA shipyard) to form a consortium for the four-ship Tamandaré project, which has an estimated budget of USD1.6 billion.

GRSE’s offering is a variant of the modified Kamorta-class (Project 28) corvette design previously proposed for the Philippine Navy frigate project. The baseline version is in service with the Indian Navy.

Basic specifications include a length of 109 m, a displacement of 2,800 tonnes, a top speed of 25 kt, and a complement of 136. Combat systems include a combat management system from Elbit, a Thales electronic warfare and communications kit, Leonardo sensors, guns and torpedoes, MBDA’s Exocet and Aster 30 missiles, Terma decoy launchers, a Canadian sonar system, as well as systems supplied by Brazilian company Ares.

GRSE will be responsible for the design and technical support, including shipyard modernisation and programme management, but will not supply any material directly, an industry source close to the subject told Jane’s . “The plan is to source as much Brazilian equipment as possible for these corvettes,” he said.

While the Brazilian Navy’s project management office EMGEPRON has released a notional design concept for the corvette, the actual design may be quite different. Brazil is looking to commission the ships between 2022 and 2025. The fleet is not meant to replace any existing ship but instead to create a new class of ships, according to the navy.

GRSE is one of nine industrial consortia bidding for the four-ship Tamandaré corvette project. The other shipyards in play are Goa Shipyard Limited, BAE Systems, Damen, Fincantieri, Naval Group, ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, Turkey’s STM, and Ukrinmash, according to an 18 June announcement by the Brazilian Navy’s Program Management Directorate (DGePM).

 janes

Make in India to go to Russia? Government to take call on Rs 2,400-crore submarine plan


The defence ministry is shortly expected to take a call on whether a Rs 2,400-crore project to extend the service life of its primary conventional submarines would be done under the Make-in-India initiative or would go to a Russian shipyard where the boats were originally manufactured.

The complicated process – which will extend the life of the Kilo class submarines by 10 years – can bring a significant amount of technology and skill to India but the Navy has been concerned that it could lead to delays. Something that it is vary of, given the declining strength of its underwater fleet.

At stake is the medium refit and life extension of two Kilo class submarines, starting with the INS Sindhuratna that is already dry docked and ready to be shipped. As per original plans that were cleared in 2016, a total of four Kilo class submarines were to be given the life extension.

While two of these were to be sent to Russia, the remaining two were to be upgraded at an Indian yard, according to a decision taken by the Defence Acquisition Committee (DAC). It is this contract for two submarines, valued at over `2,400 cr, which has become a bone of contention. Two Indian yards were in the fray for the project – L&T and the Hindustan Shipyard Limited (HSL)). While the private yard did not submit bids, HSL has emerged as the sole contender and is confident it can undertake the project.

“We have the capability of undertaking this project in India. We have been carrying out regular refits for Kilo class submarine at the yard and this would require much more work but we are confident that it can be done on time,” Rear Admiral LV Sarat Babu, CMD, HSL told ET.

At the back of the Navy’s mind is history with HSL – the yard took nine years to refit one its submarines, the INS Sindhukirti, as it went through financial difficulties in the past. HSL, however, believes that these problems have now been resolved with the yard having undergone a turnaround.
 One hurdle that will be faced with upgrading the submarines in India is whether the Russian manufacturer would give the crucial life extension certification. This can only be done by the original manufacturer of the submarine.

economictimes

L&T fast-tracks Coast Guard ships production; lays keel of two offshore petrol vessels


Larsen & Toubro is building a series of in-house designed 7 New Generation Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) for the Indian Coast Guard against a 2015 contract stipulating deliveries between 2018 to 2021.

The first OPV, despite being the First of Class (FOC), was delivered in April 2018, ahead of schedule. The second OPV launched in January 2018 is presently being readied for sea trials and is planned to be delivered ahead of schedule shortly,while system integration is in progress in 3rdand 4thOPVs, which are slated for launch later this year.

Larsen & Toubro is building a series of in-house designed 7 New Generation Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) for the Indian Coast Guard against a 2015 contract stipulating deliveries between 2018 to 2021.Today, the keels of 5thand 6th OPVswere laid by Inspector General TP Sadanandan, TM, Deputy Director General (Materiel & Maintenance) Indian Coast Guard at L&T’s Defence Shipyard at Kattupalli near Chennai.

L&T is the first Private Sector Indian shipyard to design, construct and deliver OPVs for the Defence forces with a unique distinction of being on or ahead of schedule in all Naval shipbuilding programs entrusted till date. L&T’s state-of-the-art Defence shipyard at Kattupalli features a shiplift system along with multiple dry and wet berths that enables concurrent construction of multiple ships.

Building them modularly under covered workshops and finishing on building berths on land yields unmatched pace, very high level of completion before launch and faster induction in Defence service.

Commenting on the occasion, Mr SN Subrahmanyan, MD& CEO of Larsen & Toubro said:“Our excellent performance in Defence shipbuilding stem from our deep-rooted commitment to nation building, customer orientation, innovative technology solutions, complex project management expertise and prudent financial management.

With a long term commitment to the defence sector, we have made huge investments in Kattupalli shipyard and seven other dedicated defence production units to serve the nation.”

Mr Jayant D Patil, Whole-time Director (Defence) and Member of L&T Board, said: “In the Defence Segment, L&T has an impressive reputation in in-house design, development and delivery of equipment, systems and platforms and has gained the confidence of our esteemed customers. Among Indian shipyards, we are unique to have the financial strength,track record, and huge capacity to build &deliver complex defence vessels on time.”

Vice Admiral B Kannan (Retd.), MD & CEO L&T Shipbuilding, said: “The keel laying of 5th and 6th OPVs comes close on the heels of delivery and commissioning of first OPV of the series, ICGS Vikram in April, 2018. The vessel, despite being First of Class, was completed ahead of contracted schedule, which is a record in the five-decade long history of Defence Shipbuilding in India.

The ship’s build period, which is reckoned from keel laying to delivery, was accomplished in an impressive time frame of less than 24 months and being substantially bettered on follow-on ships.”

L&T has had impeccable record of delivery of Defence vessels since inception. Earlier this month, two Interceptor Boats (IBs) designed and built by L&T were commissioned into the Indian Coast Guard, up to two years ahead of schedule.

These shipsare 39th and 40thvessels of the series of 54 interceptor boats being built by L&T. All these ships are presently deployed by the Indian Coast Guard across the Indian coastline to strengthen coastal security andaugment patrolling to prevent infiltration, smuggling and illegal fishing.

Earlier this year, L&T delivered to the Indian Navy,India’s first indigenously designed and built Floating Dock (FDN),which can dock warships / submarines of upto 8000 tons of displacement.

The FDN, which is presently stationed at Andaman & Nicobar Islands, was formally inducted into the Naval Service in May2018 at a ceremony at Port Blair. The FDN, which offers a cost effective and versatile solution for concurrent dry docking ships / submarines,has attracted attention of many prospective users.

L&T has also been entrusted by the Ministry of Defence of Socialist Republic of Vietnam to design and construct High Speed Patrol Vessels for the Vietnam Border Guard. The mandate is thus far the largest export order received by any Indian Shipyard.

The Defence shipbuilding projects at L&T are befitting examples of ‘Make in India’, as OPVs, FDN and IBs have all been designed and constructedcompletely in-house, apart from being delivered to the Defence forces ahead of contracted schedule, thereby hugely contributing to nation’s security infrastructure.

In addition, L&T supports Indian Navy and Coast Guardfor Repairs and Refit services at Kattupalli shipyard. L&T has till date completed repair / refit (SR / MR as well as Emergency Repairs) of many Indian Naval and Coast Guard ships.

 economictimes

July 2, 2018

Old suitors line up as India hunts for fighter jets again



India’s hunt for new fighter jets is starting to take shape with six global firms set to respond to an Indian Air Force request for information (RFI) to build 110 planes locally, four people familiar with the development said.

The six defence contractors who are responding to the request are Boeing (which makes the F/A-18), Lockheed Martin (F-16), Dassault Aviation (Rafale), Eurofighter consortium of BAE Systems, Airbus Group and Leonardo (Eurofighter Typhoon), Russian Aircraft Corp (MiG 35), and Saab (Gripen). The firms are the same that participated in a previous bid to supply 126 fighter jets to IAF. But the 2007 tender stood cancelled after PM Narendra Modi declared in April 2015 that India would buy 36 Rafales from France under a government-to-government deal. The companies are expected to submit their responses to the defence ministry by the July 6 deadline, the people said.

“Technology has evolved significantly over the last decade and we expect the manufacturers to offer upgraded platforms,” said a senior IAF officer who did not wish to be named.

The manufacturers will compete by stitching up alliances with Indian firms under the government’s “strategic partnership” model. As per the RFI, 16 planes are to be bought in a flyaway condition and the remaining will be built locally. “We hope there will be no political baggage attached to this programme. And it is important to ensure that the project comes to fruition this time as the numbers are crucial for the IAF,” said Air Marshal KK Nohwar (retd), director general, Centre for Air Power Studies.

The IAF wants the project to be accelerated as the count of its fighter squadrons has shrunk to 31 compared to an optimum strength of 42-plus units required to fight a two-front war with China and Pakistan.

As first reported by HT on March 12, the IAF wants the project to be directly linked to the development of an indigenous futuristic stealth fighter – the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). The manufacturer that India decides to collaborate with will have to commit to transfer of technology not only for the fighter to be built in India but also for the AMCA that is on the drawing board.

The RFI is the first step towards finding a new warplane for the air force and the makers will respond to it with operational features and technical parameters of their platforms. That will pave the way for IAF to get the ministry’s ‘acceptance of necessity’ (AoN) – the government’s stamp of approval to pursue a military programme.

 hindustantimes

Israel Is On the Verge of Selling India 4,500 Spike Tank-Killer Missiles


Israel is on the verge of selling India new anti-tank missiles.

The news was reported by both Indian and Israeli media outlets. “India is on the verge of finalizing a $500 million deal with Israel for the government-to-government purchase of around 4,500 Spike anti-tank guided missiles,” The Hindustan Times reported on June 26, citing India and Israel officials.


The deal could be finalized as early as Israel defense official Udi Adam's trip to New Delhi on July 2-3.

The deal has been a long time in the making, but appeared unlikely to take place as late as the early this year.

The Israeli defense firm Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. first agreed to sell 8,000 Spike anti-tank missiles to India in 2014. Under the original deal, 3,000 of the missiles would be manufactured in India as part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India” initiative.

But it was scuttled late last year, although different reasons have been given for the cancellation.

Some reports said India decided to torpedo the deal when India’s premier defense technology agency, the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), told Delhi that it could build a similar capability itself.

Other Indian media reports suggest Israel was to blame because it grew uncomfortable with the technology transfer parts of the agreement.

Meanwhile, Israeli outlets have suggested that the deal was cancelled because “an Indian weapons manufacturer developing a local anti-tank missile objected to the inclusion of the tech transfer clause.” Other Indian news reports backed up this assertion. The DRDO explanation makes the most sense because Delhi is purchasing a smaller number of Spike missiles to serve as stop-gap measure until it can make indigenous ones.

The Spike missile, which Israel first called the Tamuz missile, has a long and storied history for the Jewish state. Jerusalem first began trying to develop a better anti-tank capability following the near disaster of the Yom Kippur War in 1973.

As Charlie Gao has noted for The National Interest , the Spike Non-Line-of-Sight (Spike-NLOS) was the first surface-to-surface missile to use TV guidance.

“To achieve this, the Spike-NLOS has a tiny fiber-optic cable linking the launching vehicle with the missile, as well as a camera in the missile itself,” Gao wrote.

“Through this datalink, the Spike-NLOS operator sees a view of the battlefield . The operator then proceeds to guide the missile to the target.”

The Spike missile adds good range to its precision attack. The most advanced versions can hit targets up to 30 kilometers away. And, as Gao notes, “the TV guidance allows the missile to retarget in flight, as the operator only needs to steer to a different target. It also doesn’t require a ‘lock’ to launch, the operator only needs to know the rough coordinates of the target, allowing Spike-NLOS to act as precision artillery.”

The most recent versions also boast a true homing capability, and it can be tied into Israel’s command-and-control centers so that it can use targeting data acquired from other sources such as radar and reconnaissance drones.

Jerusalem has also developed numerous different variants of the missile for different purposes.

Israel has used the Spike missile to great success, especially in the Second Lebanon War and intifadas. In these instances, Israel sometimes used its extreme precision to take out targets in crowded, urban battles, although it was also used to take out artillery.

Jerusalem has had a lot of success exporting the missile even before the India deal. Among the operators of the missile include the United Kingdom, South Korea, Spain, Singapore, Italy, Germany, and Finland, among many, many others. South Korea uses the missiles to target the massive artillery pieces North Korea maintains just across the border.

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has used the systems in places like Iraq and Afghanistan in similar ways that Israel did in Palestine and Lebanon.

The Indian deal for the Spike missiles continues a trend of growing defense ties between Jerusalem and Delhi.

Last year Israel saw its military exports rise a staggering 41 percent compared with 2016. Of Israel’s $9.2 billion in arms sales in 2017, fifty-eight percent went to the Asia-Pacific.

India overwhelming led the way with Israel selling it $1.6 billion worth of Barak 8 air defense systems. Besides the missiles and launchers, the Barak 8 deal included command, control and radar systems, along with communications devices, according to a report in Haaretz.

Meanwhile, India’s Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) continues to develop the third-generation Nag anti-tank guided missile. After a test in late February of this year, the agency said, “with this, the developmental trials of the missile have been completed and it is now ready for induction.”

This wasn’t the first time DRDO claimed to reach this milestone, and the fact that Delhi is going ahead with the Spike missile deal suggests Indian’s armed services do not believe it is operational.

Ultimately, India hopes to procure 8,000 of the Nag missiles.

 nationalinterest

India spends $6 BILLION on Russian missiles – yet UK pays them £60 MILLION each year


INDIA is set to spend almost $6 BILLION on cutting-edge S-400 air missile defence systems from Russia - despite the UK investing £60 million each year into the heavily poverty-stricken country.

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has forwarded the deal for the purchase of five S-400 units to the Finance Ministry and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office for Government approval. The cost equates to £4.3 billion.

According to Russian television network RT, the S-400 Triumf can engage with targets at a range of up to 40km and ballistic missiles up to 60km away.

It can use at least four interceptor missile types - one S-400 division can engage up to 36 targets simultaneously.

A source at the Defence Acquisitions Council (DAC) told the Times of India: “The S-400 procurement case will now go to the finance ministry for clearance and the PM-led Cabinet Committee on Security for the final nod.

“The country’s top political leadership will have to take a call on when the actual contract can be inked.”

At the end of last year, it was revealed that India’s NASA-style space agency ISRO has become so successful that it now launches satellites for the USA, and boasts the 10th largest economy in the world.

It had a growing battery of more than 130 Indian-built nuclear warheads, with the country expected to outstrip the UK’s 215-strong nuclear deterrent in the next decade.

India’s Nuclear budget almost exactly matched the UK’s at around £5 billion.

But the country remains heavily poverty-stricken - according to figures from the Department for International Development (DFID), India received £186m in foreign aid in 2015 from a total of £12.1 billion - but that was the last year the country received "traditional aid" from the UK.

Its budget for India in the period 2017/18 was £60 million - £30 million for "traditional assistance" and £30 million for "development capital".

A DFID spokesman said: "DFID ended traditional aid to India in 2015. The UK now provides world-leading expertise and private investment to boost prosperity, create jobs and open up markets - which is firmly in our interests.

"This will help lift people out of poverty and strengthen the UK-India partnership, which is increasingly important as the UK leaves the EU."

Last month, it was revealed that India has the world’s second largest poor population behind Nigeria.
According to figures from World Poverty Clock, 73 million Indian people or 5.3 percent of the total population still live in “extreme poverty” - classed as a person living on less than $1.90 a day.

The multi-billion pound purchase of the S-400 has also come under strong opposition from the US.

According to RT, the deal, provisionally discussed in a summit between Mr Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin in October 2016, has raised questions over the possible imposition of US sanctions, which aim to deter nations from buying Russian weapons.

US armed services committee chairman Mac Thornberry said in May: “The acquisition of this technology will limit, I am afraid, the degree with which the United States will feel comfortable in bringing additional technology into whatever country we are talking about.”

Mr Thornberry added that there is also concern that “any country that acquires the system will complicate the ability of interoperability” with US forces.

 express.co.uk