Independent military observer Vladimir Tuchkov outlines why the T-50 PAK-FA fighter’s new, truly fifth-gen engines are set to turn the aircraft into easily the best fifth generation fighter aircraft in the world. Last week, speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the MAKS-2017 air show, Russian Aerospace Defense Forces Commander Col. Gen. Viktor Bondarev told reporters that the first stage of state testing on the T-50 (PAK-FA) fifth generation stealth air superiority fighter have been completed, and that the first flight tests would be finished before the end of the year. Trials will continue into 2018, and mass production of the T-50 for introduction into the air force is slated to begin in 2019.
One of major obstacles widely reported to have held the T-50 back from production in the past was the absence of a true fifth-generation engine for the aircraft, with prototypes of the aircraft using a derivative of the AL-41F1 engine, similar to the one used in the Sukhoi Su-35S 4++ generation multirole fighter. But now, Russian designers are on the brink of reaching a breakthrough on a totally new, truly fifth-gen engine, known as Izdeliye 30 (Product 30), a design which experts say has no equivalents in the world of engine construction. Developed from scratch over the course of almost a decade at the Saturn Tool-Making Plant in Rybinsk, central Russia, Izdeliye 30 features improved thrust characteristics (19,000 kgf vs. 15,000 kgf in the AL-41F1), better fuel efficiency, fewer moving parts, and subsequently improved reliability and lower maintenance costs. Ground tests for the engine have already been completed. Now, following its installation aboard the T-50, the second stage of testing, both for the engine and the plane, can begin.
This process is expected to start in the fall. Commenting on the significance of this development, military journalist and Svobodnaya Pressa contributor Vladimir Tuchkov explained that the long-awaited pairing of the T-50 with a fifth-generation engine will be a milestone, one giving Russia not only a true next generation fighter aircraft, but undoubtedly the best plane of its kind in the world. For starters, the analyst noted, “in terms of maneuverability, the T-50 is second-to-none. This was predestined by the design of its airframe,” as well as the plane’s three dimensional thrust vector jets, a design which the US does not have. The F-22 Raptor, for example, uses two-dimensional vector thrust jets, affecting only its pitch, for maneuverability.
The F-35 Lightning II lacks the capability altogether, except for its vertical take-off and landing functions. No information is available regarding China’s J-20 stealth fighter. In the stealth department, the T-50’s radar cross section (rcs) value is 0.1-0.5m, significantly higher than the F-22 and the F-35 (whose values are an impressive 0.0001 and 0.0015). However, Tuchkov emphasized that the rcs indicators are “a subject wide open to conjecture, based on disinformation provided either by developers for advertising purposes…or for the purpose of disorienting the enemy (so that he cannot predict in advance the tactics of air battles and interception by air defense forces).” Military observers have long said and written that among the major military powers (and sometimes even among smaller ones) the ‘antidotes’to stealth technology have a tendency to be conceived of, designed and deployed long before stealth fighters ever get off the ground.
Furthermore, the engines onboard every stealth aircraft give off thermal signatures which infrared sensor systems (including those used by Russia) could easily pick up and track.
Finally, Russia also has over-the-horizon surface-wave radar systems capable of detecting stealth jets “as clearly as WWII-era aircraft.” In other words, while the idea of a magic plane invisible to enemy air defenses may be relevant when fighting small countries with Cold War-era radar and air defense technology, in combat with larger powers, other factors, including a plane’s target detection systems, as well as its range of their missiles, are far more significant. In the first area, Tuchkov noted that T-50’s delayed start behind both the F-22 and the F-35 worked out perfectly for the developers of the plane’s onboard radar systems, giving them access to fundamentally new electronic components and technologies which were unavailable ten or even five years before. “Furthermore, Russian designers were able to take into account, as far as possible, the experience of the F-22’s radar,” the journalist wrote. “First, it must be said that the angle of the T-50’s active phased array is installed on an incline.
Because of this, the aircraft’s rcs is reduced. Going with this design, which also makes possible a reduction in power usage during operation, was made possible thanks to the excellent characteristics of the N036 Belka radar, developed to replace the N035 Irbis passive phased array antenna system.”
The N036 is more effective than the N035, Tuchkov noted, but even the earlier system “remains very convincing when compared with the US AN/APG-77 radar. The Russian system finds targets with an rcs of 1 square meter at distances up to 300 km. The American radar, meanwhile, does the same up to 225 km. For targets with an rcs of 0.01 square meters, the Russian radar’s range is 90 km. For the US system these figures are not available.” Altogether, the T-50 has six radars onboard – including one on the plane’s nose, two on its sides, two on the wings and one in the aft section.
They are capable of monitoring up to 60 targets at once, and targeting up to 15. “In addition to the radar-based visibility, the T-50 features the OLS-50M optic-electronic sensor system, which includes a thermal scanner using a QWIP-matrix with unique resolution and range characteristics. In this area…Russia is considered to be the absolute world leader,” the military observer stressed. A similar system, which enables the pilot to detect targets which have their radar systems turned off, is fitted on the F-35, albeit the US design has a smaller range. The F-22 does not have this technology.If there is one advantage of the F-35’s avionics to speak of, “it is the pilot’s helmet, which makes the aircraft ‘transparent,’” Tuchkov wrote. “That is, visibility is not limited by the cockpit windows.
The whole panorama of the surrounding area is displayed in the pilot’s visors, in both the visible and the infrared spectrum. Monitoring the pilot’s head and eye movements, the computer provides the necessary panoramic viewpoint and provides the pilots with tips, and manages targeting.” Finally, and perhaps most importantly, when it comes to armaments, here the T-50 stands out, according to the observer. Among all the world’s existing and prospective fifth-generation fighter aircraft, “the T-50 has the most extensive missile and bomb arsenal.
A total of 14 high-precision missiles and smart bombs have been developed specifically for the plane. Half have already been adopted into service; the other half are undergoing testing. The KS-172, the longest-range air-to-air missile, has a maximum range up to 400 km. This is double that of the US AIM-120D missile, which has a maximum range of 180 km.”As for air-to-surface missiles, here too the T-50 has systems that are “at the forefront of engineering solutions,” Tuchkov noted. “Using them, the pilot has the opportunity to conduct a ‘free hunt’, with the missiles themselves choosing targets independently. The US planes, meanwhile, use missiles developed in the early 2000s, and modernized in the 2010s in the best case scenario.
sputnik
Independent military
observer Vladimir Tuchkov outlines why the T-50 PAK-FA fighter’s new,
truly fifth-gen engines are set to turn the aircraft into easily the
best fifth generation fighter aircraft in the world.
Last week, speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the MAKS-2017 air
show, Russian Aerospace Defense Forces Commander Col. Gen. Viktor
Bondarev told reporters that the first stage of state testing on the
T-50 (PAK-FA) fifth generation stealth air superiority fighter have been
completed, and that the first flight tests would be finished before the
end of the year.
Trials will continue into 2018, and mass production of the T-50 for
introduction into the air force is slated to begin in 2019.
One of major obstacles widely reported to have held the T-50 back from
production in the past was the absence of a true fifth-generation engine
for the aircraft, with prototypes of the aircraft using a derivative of
the AL-41F1 engine, similar to the one used in the Sukhoi Su-35S 4++
generation multirole fighter.
But now, Russian designers are on the brink of reaching a breakthrough
on a totally new, truly fifth-gen engine, known as Izdeliye 30 (Product
30), a design which experts say has no equivalents in the world of
engine construction.
Developed from scratch over the course of almost a decade at the Saturn
Tool-Making Plant in Rybinsk, central Russia, Izdeliye 30 features
improved thrust characteristics (19,000 kgf vs. 15,000 kgf in the
AL-41F1), better fuel efficiency, fewer moving parts, and subsequently
improved reliability and lower maintenance costs.
Ground tests for the engine have already been completed. Now, following
its installation aboard the T-50, the second stage of testing, both for
the engine and the plane, can begin. This process is expected to start
in the fall.
Commenting on the significance of this development, military journalist
and Svobodnaya Pressa contributor Vladimir Tuchkov explained that the
long-awaited pairing of the T-50 with a fifth-generation engine will be a
milestone, one giving Russia not only a true next generation fighter
aircraft, but undoubtedly the best plane of its kind in the world.
For starters, the analyst noted, “in terms of maneuverability, the T-50
is second-to-none. This was predestined by the design of its airframe,”
as well as the plane’s three dimensional thrust vector jets, a design
which the US does not have.
The F-22 Raptor, for example, uses two-dimensional vector thrust jets,
affecting only its pitch, for maneuverability. The F-35 Lightning II
lacks the capability altogether, except for its vertical take-off and
landing functions. No information is available regarding China’s J-20
stealth fighter.
In the stealth department, the T-50’s radar cross section (rcs) value is
0.1-0.5m, significantly higher than the F-22 and the F-35 (whose values
are an impressive 0.0001 and 0.0015).
However, Tuchkov emphasized that the rcs indicators are “a subject wide
open to conjecture, based on disinformation provided either by
developers for advertising purposes…or for the purpose of disorienting
the enemy (so that he cannot predict in advance the tactics of air
battles and interception by air defense forces).”
Military observers have long said and written that among the major
military powers (and sometimes even among smaller ones) the
‘antidotes’to stealth technology have a tendency to be conceived of,
designed and deployed long before stealth fighters ever get off the
ground. Furthermore, the engines onboard every stealth aircraft give off
thermal signatures which infrared sensor systems (including those used
by Russia) could easily pick up and track. Finally, Russia also has
over-the-horizon surface-wave radar systems capable of detecting stealth
jets “as clearly as WWII-era aircraft.”
In other words, while the idea of a magic plane invisible to enemy air
defenses may be relevant when fighting small countries with Cold War-era
radar and air defense technology, in combat with larger powers, other
factors, including a plane’s target detection systems, as well as its
range of their missiles, are far more significant.
In the first area, Tuchkov noted that T-50’s delayed start behind both
the F-22 and the F-35 worked out perfectly for the developers of the
plane’s onboard radar systems, giving them access to fundamentally new
electronic components and technologies which were unavailable ten or
even five years before. “Furthermore, Russian designers were able to
take into account, as far as possible, the experience of the F-22’s
radar,” the journalist wrote.
“First, it must be said that the angle of the T-50’s active phased array
is installed on an incline. Because of this, the aircraft’s rcs is
reduced. Going with this design, which also makes possible a reduction
in power usage during operation, was made possible thanks to the
excellent characteristics of the N036 Belka radar, developed to replace
the N035 Irbis passive phased array antenna system.”
The N036 is more effective than the N035, Tuchkov noted, but even the
earlier system “remains very convincing when compared with the US
AN/APG-77 radar. The Russian system finds targets with an rcs of 1
square meter at distances up to 300 km. The American radar, meanwhile,
does the same up to 225 km. For targets with an rcs of 0.01 square
meters, the Russian radar’s range is 90 km. For the US system these
figures are not available.”
Altogether, the T-50 has six radars onboard – including one on the
plane’s nose, two on its sides, two on the wings and one in the aft
section. They are capable of monitoring up to 60 targets at once, and
targeting up to 15.
“In addition to the radar-based visibility, the T-50 features the
OLS-50M optic-electronic sensor system, which includes a thermal scanner
using a QWIP-matrix with unique resolution and range characteristics.
In this area…Russia is considered to be the absolute world leader,” the
military observer stressed. A similar system, which enables the pilot to
detect targets which have their radar systems turned off, is fitted on
the F-35, albeit the US design has a smaller range. The F-22 does not
have this technology.If there is one advantage of the F-35’s avionics to
speak of, “it is the pilot’s helmet, which makes the aircraft
‘transparent,’” Tuchkov wrote. “That is, visibility is not limited by
the cockpit windows. The whole panorama of the surrounding area is
displayed in the pilot’s visors, in both the visible and the infrared
spectrum. Monitoring the pilot’s head and eye movements, the computer
provides the necessary panoramic viewpoint and provides the pilots with
tips, and manages targeting.”
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, when it comes to armaments, here
the T-50 stands out, according to the observer.
Among all the world’s existing and prospective fifth-generation fighter
aircraft, “the T-50 has the most extensive missile and bomb arsenal. A
total of 14 high-precision missiles and smart bombs have been developed
specifically for the plane. Half have already been adopted into service;
the other half are undergoing testing. The KS-172, the longest-range
air-to-air missile, has a maximum range up to 400 km. This is double
that of the US AIM-120D missile, which has a maximum range of 180 km.”As
for air-to-surface missiles, here too the T-50 has systems that are “at
the forefront of engineering solutions,” Tuchkov noted. “Using them,
the pilot has the opportunity to conduct a ‘free hunt’, with the
missiles themselves choosing targets independently. The US planes,
meanwhile, use missiles developed in the early 2000s, and modernized in
the 2010s in the best case scenario.”
idrw.org .Read more at India No 1 Defence News Website
http://idrw.org/pak-fas-new-engines-make-it-easily-the-best-5th-gen-fighter-in-the-world/ .
